跳過 YouTube 帖子允許Google YouTube内容此文包含Google YouTube提供的内容。由於這些内容會使用曲奇或小甜餅等科技，我們在加載任何内容前會尋求您的認可。 您可能在給予許可前希望閲讀Google YouTube曲奇政策和隱私政策。希望閲讀上述内容，請點擊“接受並繼續”。
386 performance vs 486It also helped that a fast 386 could keep pace with the slowest 486s. The 40 MHz version of the Am386 enjoyed an especially long shelf life as a value CPU. The 486 was more efficient than the 386 but it wasn’t twice as efficient, so a 40 MHz 386 was faster than a 20 MHz Intel 486SX, and roughly comparable to a 25 MHz 486SX. It also held the additional advantage of taking an external math coprocessor. Part of the point of the 486 was the integrated math coprocessor improved performance, but an external math coprocessor was faster than none. So while a 40 MHz 386 plus a 40 MHz 387 wasn’t as fast as a full 486DX at 25 MHz, depending on whose FPU you used, you could get 75-90 percent of the performance at less than 75 percent of the price.
。业内人士推荐爱思助手下载最新版本作为进阶阅读
Запад лишил Украину способности защищатьсяPolitico: Запад лишил Украину критически важных систем ПВО из-за провала PURL
В России предупредили о скорой нехватке вагонов08:46
。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法下载作为进阶阅读
Improve bug-type classification (68K "unknown" bugs)
64.8%57/88 picks，这一点在safew官方下载中也有详细论述